Monthly Archives: September 2010

The Return to Form Edition.

A guilty pleasure from the very first episode, Desperate Housewives’ quality has been somewhat dwindling ever since the end of the fourth season, when the writers misguidedly jumped the storyline five years into the future.

Whereas seasons one to four were full of what makes the series so great; humour, scandalous storylines and great heart, five paled in comparison and delivered a near awful season, turning the occasionally gripping show into background fodder at best. For the most part, Season six was an improvement. The mystery was interestingly drip-fed and no way near as obvious as the season five revenge debacle concerning Mike and Edie Britt’s psychotic husband Dave. Also, the storylines were watchable and performances back on form, with Felicity Huffman’s portrayal of Lynette Scavo still being the best housewife on Wisteria Lane.

The season wasn’t without its flaws however, the gimmicky ‘disaster’ episode (concerning a renegade jumbo jet crashing onto the lane and dispensing many lives) half way through was laughable at best, guest stars like Julie Benz playing a lesbian stripper and English starlet John Barrowman as psychopathic terrorist Charles Logan were overused and largely unnecessary. The former addition to the cast acted only as a catalyst to wrap up Katherine Mayfair’s character in the most ridiculously arbitrary way, presumably because they had run out of ideas for her, which was a shame because Katherine had been a highlight since her fiery debut in season four and her presence will be missed. Also, the sub-mystery regarding the secretive ‘Fairview Strangler’ which ran throughout had zero suspense and, come the eventual unveiling, was just boring and merely a diversionary tactic to fill in the gaps. Nevertheless, the shows sixth season was an indication of a return to the shows glory days, leaving the pathway clear for the writers to rewrite their previous wrongs.

As with every season, a lot is riding on the upcoming seventh season to deliver more entertaining storylines and also to bring something new to the table. It doesn’t take a genius to know that the predominant problem with Desperate Housewives as a whole is that it has a lazy tendency to borrow, repeat and reuse soapy clichés and storylines from previous seasons, yet relocate them to other characters and situations. It is repetitive and gives the show an unwanted predictability which renders most of the mysteries passive and easy to figure out before their over the top dénouement. In my opinion, the mysteries are the reason for the shows increasing downfall. They usually contain a downtrodden woman on the run from a menacing ex husband and a dangerous secret, or a devious man plotting to find justice for a previous predicament. Either the writers need to come up with something new and gripping (as with season one) or banish the concept altogether, they lend next to nothing to the season’s overall arc and merely distract attention from the core four protagonists, the main reason audiences watch the show in the first place.

Nevertheless, season seven has plenty of material left over from season six’s tepid finale to build upon; Lynette finally gave birth to a baby girl, her fifth child and second daughter. She gave birth whilst in the clutches of the ‘Fairview strangler’, who was revealed to be fragile local boy Eddie who suffered from an easily-flared temper and some serious mother issues. Fortunately, Eddie gave up his murderous spree and gave himself up in typical DH fashion (where the writers conveniently wrap up characters and storylines just in time for the season finale).

After finally being part of a mystery and in turn saving the day, Gabby was left with minimal material to carry over to the new season, although the revelation from a close friend could have serious repercussions for the future of their relationship. Susan and Mike, still suffering from his financial woes, upped sticks, put their house up for rent and were forced to move off the lane much to the sympathies of their nearest and dearest. And finally, having given into blackmail and selling her business to scheming stepson Sam, Bree has to face life as a single woman again following Orson’s decision to end their patchy marriage, accusing her of hypocrisy and maltreatment when it came to deciding between her husband and her children. Furthermore, a hospital hiccup revealed that one of the ladies’ children may not actually belong to them, and the new tenant of Susan’s house turned out to be none other than Paul Young, the show’s original villain who did whatever he could to uncover the mystery behind his wife’s suicide all those years ago.

The arrival of Paul Young is a strong sign of the hopeful high quality of the seventh season, as it has been confirmed that his nemesis, Felicia Tilman, who went into hiding at the end of season two after framing him for murder, will finally re-appear, uprooting season ones tense finale. Felicia is a great character brought to life by Harriet Samson Harris who lends her a creepy, vindictive streak and gave viewers a character viewers loved to hate.

A new series of DH wouldn’t be the same without new characters, and the most famous addition this time round is actress Vanessa Williams who joins the cast as an old friend of Lynette’s. Best known for her role as Wilhelmina Slater in Ugly Betty, Williams will hopefully be a successful newcomer whose talents aren’t wasted like some actresses who have made appearances on the show before (Frances Conroy in season five, for example).

For the first time in some while I am most looking forward to Bree’s storylines. It can easily be seen that Marcia Cross’s talents have been somewhat wasted in the latter seasons, with her character becoming a shadow of her fiery, conservative persona played to perfection in season one. Bree has lost the much needed bite that made her so watchable and hopefully her storylines will rein back those acidic yet hilarious traits, and it’d be interesting to see her without a male counterpart for a change.

With the news that creator Marc Cherry has plans for an eighth and ninth season, there is hopefully still more life in this show and hopefully they can pull some new tricks out of the hat to keep the viewers watching and keep the show fresh. Okay, it’s never going to be the most watched show in America anymore; it’s alienated too many viewers for that to happen, but I personally will still watch it, only because I have invested so much time and affection in these characters. Cherry himself has said he will be scaling down his influence on the show from now on to focus on other projects which in my opinion is a blessing as the show needs some fresh blood and a new approach as it is running the risk of becoming stale rather quickly. If they can return season seven back to its roots, then it will be a relief, if not, then it will continue to be as mediocre as it has been and I will always enjoy it for what it is, the guiltiest of pleasures.

Coogan and Brydon take a trip.

The Trip

Building upon the rapport they previously shared in one of Michael Winterbottom’s past films, A Cock and Bull Story, Steve Coogan and Rob Brydon reteam once again in the directors’ latest comedy, a decidedly light-hearted U-turn after his adaptation of The Killer Inside Me earlier this year.

Effectively a six-part television series meshed into one 90 minute feature, The Trip features the stars playing fictionalised versions of themselves, with Coogan embodying a food critic scouring the Lake District for fine cuisine and even finer sexual conquests. Replacing Coogans’ absent girlfriend, Brydon tags along on this tour of several top UK restaurants, demonstrating the duos unique friendship as they make their way through meticulously made, diverse delicacies. The largely improvised events that ensue are proof of the two stars unquestionable chemistry and their ability to adapt their comedic talents to any setting or scenario.

The film features beautiful shots of the British countryside coupled with some hilarious verbal sparring between the two, who swap copious amounts of the uncanny impressions of which they have become known for. These range from Michael Caine to Sean Connery, with Dustin Hoffman and Woody Allen being particularly funny highlights. Though the pace does slacken slightly during the third act, it was reassuring to know that there was a fresh joke mere minutes away.

As much a hilarious road trip as an engaging character study, Winterbottom’s latest is a tremendously enjoyable British film as well as a taster for the eagerly awaited TV show, which will be begin later this year and deserves to be a big hit.

5/5

  • A Cock and Bull Story, 2005. [Film] Directed by Michael Winterbottom, UK: BBC Films.
  • The Killer Inside Me, 2010. [Film] Directed by Michael Winterbottom, USA: Muse Productions.
  • The Trip, 2010. [Film] Directed by Michael Winterbottom, UK: Revolution Films.

Tamara Drewe review.

Tamara Drewe

(Stephen Frears, 2010, UK)

★★★☆☆

Adapted from a comic strip published in The Guardian newspaper and inspired by Thomas Hardy’s Far From the Madding Crowd, Stephen Frears’ latest film, Tamara Drewe, exposes a frothy, sun-drenched romp set in rural Dorset and features a highly impressive cast of British talent.

Gemma Arterton fills the hotpants of protagonist Tamara Drewe, a feisty, attractive journalist who returns to her static hometown to settle the assets of her recently deceased mother. Initially bored by the rustic bourgeois of Ewedown, Devon, Tamara manages to catch the eye of many of the sex starved locals, including a dashing old flame, a tempestuous rock star and best-selling novelist Nicholas Hardiment (played with relish by Roger Allam). Her arrival scratches the surface of this seemingly idyllic locale, revealing buried passions, forgotten desires and scandalous indiscretions.

Though the film has a few stand-out moments and an excessively tongue-in-cheek nature, Tamara Drewe suffers from a flippant tone, jokes that miss more than they hit and an abundance of plot strands and characters, with enough material to fill a TV mini-series. The film could have done with a hefty edit, which would’ve prevented it from dragging slightly in its flouncy third act and kept the attention centred on one constant narrative.

Yet for all its gaping flaws and inconsistent focus, I found myself enjoying the film more than my initially low expectations lead me to believe, it’s overstuffed yet inoffensive and features some great performances. At the films core is a heartbreaking turn from Tamsin Greig as the downtrodden, pleasantly frumpy Beth, who must cope with her husband’s copious affairs whilst harbouring hidden desires of her own.

While not Frears’ worst film, it is by no means his best either, but then again, I am perhaps not exactly his target demographic this time round.

  • Tamara Drewe [Film] Directed by Stephen Frears. UK: BBC Films.

The Town review.


The Town

(Ben Affleck, 2010, USA)

★★★☆☆

After suffering from an acting career that grew from bad to worse, Ben Affleck went on to direct Gone Baby Gone back in 2007, a gritty thriller dealing with a shocking epidemic ripped straight from the headlines. The film was critically lauded and proved the naysayers wrong, demonstrating the prospect that this was an actor who had hidden talents on the other side of the camera. Affleck now continues this tense filmmaking style with his second directorial effort, a rough immortality tale set in Charlestown, Massachusetts, a city responsible for the highest number of bank robberies, we are told.

Affleck casts himself in the lead role of Doug MacRay, an Irish-American, blue collar bank robber alongside a team of violent cronies, including The Hurt Locker’s Jeremy Renner as his reckless accomplice. Doug struggles to evade the attentions of an FBI agent dedicated in bringing them down and also with his growing feelings for a bank manager who is connected to one of his previous heists, all the while looking for any means of escape.

Despite a few punchy, well directed sequences and a riveting twenty minute shoot-out at the films climax, The Town suffers from a half-hearted script, slim characterisation and an uninspired plot, which effectively boils down to a standard, clichéd narrative centred on one man’s pursuit of redemption. Bad guy meets girl, bad guy falls for girl, bad guy wants to flee his decayed life to start afresh but must do one more job to sever his illegitimate ties, etc etc.

The films strengths lie in its strong cast, with a confident performance from Mad Men’s John Hamm, an impressive turn from the talented Renner and able support provided by Pete Postlethwaite. However they’re somewhat let down by an overly glum Rebecca Hall who is too morose to be fully engaging and Affleck still isn’t the best actor around. While not a bad film; The Town’s enjoyably adult attitude and dark humour are bogged down by an overly generic formula.

 

  • Gone Baby Gone, 2007. [Film] Directed by Ben Affleck, USA: Miramax Films.
  • The Town, 2010. [Film] Directed by Ben Affleck. USA: Warner Bros. Pictures.

Monsters review.

Monsters

(Gareth Edwards, 2010, USA)

★★★★★

Shot on location in New Mexico and featuring a cast of relatively unknown actors, Gareth Edwards has made a low-budget, mini-masterpiece in Monsters, a mesh of typical genre aesthetics and raw human emotions, featuring two protagonists you can really connect with. A rarity in the science fiction genre, one can argue.

The plot centres on pessimistic journalist Andrew Kaulder who agrees to accompany an American tourist to the safety of the US border, where she will be reunited with her domineering father. What makes this task challenging is the hazardous infected zone they must travel through, spanning a large part of Mexico and is occupied by hostile extraterrestrials.

Monster’s strengths lie in its simplicities; the aliens are rarely seen and the action is sporadic, which is admittedly frustrating but effective in equal measure. Overuse would render the film similar to a bog standard B-movie spectacle but minimum focus will easily irk audiences. Thankfully, Monsters’ holds just the right amount of exposure to keep the audience on the edge of their seats throughout its slender 90 minute runtime.

Beautifully shot and capably handled, the film is a heartfelt and touching exploration of these two troubled characters which just happens to feature extraterrestrials as a backdrop to the central narrative. With rickety camerawork that rivals (but never copies) the gimmicky Cloverfield and a narrative that combines elements from many alien based movies, predominantly last year’s enjoyable District 9, Edwards’s film excels in keeping the audience’s attentions close and their anticipations even closer.

  • Cloverfield, 2008. [Film] Directed by Matt Reeves, USA: Paramount Pictures.
  • District 9, 2009. [Film] Directed by Neill Blomkamp, USA/New Zealand: TriStar Pictures.
  • Monsters, 2010. [Film] Directed by Gareth Edwards, UK: Vertigo Films.

The Extraordinary Adventures of Adèle Blanc-Sec review.

The Extraordinary Adentures of Adèle Blanc-Sec

(Luc Besson 2010, USA)

★★★★☆

Maintaining his customary visual flair and cinematic mastery, Luc Besson returns once again with his latest auteurist vision, possibly his most audacious and visually commanding film since 1997’s imaginative The Fifth Element.

Utilising the talents of cinematographer Thierry Arbogast (the two worked together on The Fifth Element), Besson presents an impressively shot, ambitious tale packed with supernatural escapades and humorously memorable characters, coupled with all the best elements of the fantasy-adventure genre. With a playful tone and a plot scaling back to pre-war, 1912 Paris, this is an endlessly original film blending a weird and wonderful quest with bumbling policemen, reawakened mummies and a ravenous pterodactyl. Hollywood, take note.

Filling the title role is Louise Bourgoin, a stimulating screen presence who lends a watchable capability to her humorously sharp character; a debonair explorer who fuses snappy one-liners with a sentimental hidden agenda. Blanc-Sec is feisty, gorgeous and intelligent with a confident talent for tomb raiding and an impressive speciality for disguise. Think Lara Croft but without the pistols, British austerity and exaggerated bosoms. She is also a refreshing addition to Besson’s attention to strong female protagonists, previously seen with Nikita and Leon’s pre-pubescent character Matilda.

Although dragged down by an occasionally juvenile demeanour and clichéd characterisation, The Extraordinary Adventures of Adèle Blanc-Sec is nevertheless visually rich, narratively exciting and fully deserving of its place amongst Besson’s impressive oeuvre. It’s no classic, but it is a stirring film worthy of a wider audience than it will probably receive.


  • The Extroardinary Adventures of Adèle Blanc-Sec, 2010. [Film] Directed by Luc Besson, France: Europa Corp.
  • The Fifth Element, 1997. [Film] Directed by Luc Besson, France: Gaumont.
  • Léon, 1994. [Film] Directed by Luc Besson, France: Gaumont.
  • Nikita, [Film] Directed by Luc Besson, France: Gaumont.