Review: Beware of Mr. Baker

Legendary Cream drummer Ginger Baker, left, with BEWARE OF MR. B

(Jay Bulger, 2012)
(Originally posted at Take One)

Taking its name from a warning sign adorning the driveway of a particularly cantankerous British rock ‘n’ roll legend, Jay Bulger’s all-encompassing documentary Beware of Mr. Baker (2012) peers behind the dark glasses and gruff facade of one Ginger Baker: wunderkind drummer, world renowned agent of disaster and, most significantly, the destructive member of a variety of bands, namely Cream. Notable in his infamy, Baker is a figure tainted by a catalogue of ill-fated decisions and a history of substance abuse, and here is the focus and subject matter for Bulger, who makes his impressive filmmaking debut.

Starting in the present day, which sees Baker breaking the nose of his chronicler – and, arguably, one of a few of his confidantes – in a characteristic outburst of rage, Bulger’s film then journeys backwards and plunges into Baker’s early life and the wild and destructive career that has lead him to, at the time of filming, living a secluded life in South Africa, having journeyed there to sample the life-changing tribal drumming techniques practised there. Studying his troubled childhood, his beginnings as a gifted but untapped musician and the subsequent ascent into the gritty echelons of London’s jazzy, pre-rock ‘n’ roll scene, Bulger utilises a number of techniques to depict the inspirational-cum-tragic tenor of his subject, whose quick submission to the enticements of drugs irrevocably changed his life.

As Bulger flits back and forwards in time (and indeed to and from archive materials, animated sequences and talking head interviews with an abundance of Baker’s previous acquaintances such as Eric Claption), the hidden truths about Baker slowly begin to seep out; he is, of course, a fiery personality that time is quickly beginning to forget, but he is also a caring and secretly kind man jaded by own his weaknesses. In the later stages of his career, when his affiliation with the short-lived Cream was drying up faster than his bank account, Bulger focuses on his charity and his obsessions with horses and polo, elements that both added to his compulsive personality and monetary downfall. In the more contemporary portions of the documentary, the camera stares, motionless, at a static, bitter and contrary 73-year-old Baker mumbling through anecdotes and spouting vitriolic lines and observations as he puts the world to questionable rights. He is vivacious and infectious, a tortured soul with a fascinating history, and Bulger does an excellent job of capturing him at his chequered highs and miniscule lows.

However much the director’s almost faultless affection for his subject glosses over the darkness, the selfishness and the occasionally unbelievable amount of pain he has caused to the people who admire and love him (especially the family he callously disregarded), Beware of Mr. Baker is a fascinating, comprehensive and sympathetic portrait of an explosively flamboyant figure in British rock history, one that paints an interesting picture of the grimy 1960s and 70s rock climate that chewed up this thumping musical virtuoso and pitilessly spat him out.

Review: Star Trek Into Darkness

Screen shot 2013-05-09 at 18.06.58

(J.J.Abrams, 2013)

2009 saw bespectacled boy wonder J.J Abrams doing the inconceivable: transposing Gene Rodenberry’s beloved creation into the 21st century and giving it a gleamingly cool polish, reminding the world that it was a sci-fi franchise capable of being very much in vogue. Star Trek (2009) was that rare species of Hollywood blockbuster: a CGI-laden romp with a sense of both humour and nostalgia, but also a teeming desire to not merely rehash old ground but deliver to contemporary fans a fresh and exuberant spin on a dusty format. This was done by incorporating an ingeniously assembled alternate reality, allowing Abrams and writers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, to freely break away from continuity restrictions whilst upholding certain relevant story elements and, more importantly, fan favour. Four years later Abrams returns to the directorial chair – before propelling off to a galaxy far, far away for the upcoming Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) – for belated sequel Star Trek Into Darkness (2013), which sees him reteaming with Orci and Kurtzman (alongside producer Damon Lindelof, given a writers credit) and embarking on a decidedly more ambitious yet flat and impersonal adventure amongst the stars.

Following up a largely superior first outing, Abrams et al have the unenviable task of trying to replicate its winning formula, which is something Into Darkness excels at through the preservation of a formula grounded by the seamless balancing of action and humour – however much it maintains the first’s schizophrenic attention span, where spectacle monotonously interrupts drama. The other jewel in its imperfect crown is the return of a cast who, rapidly and memorably, grew into their characters first time round. Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto’s perfectly rendered Captain James T Kirk and Spock, respectively, are complemented by the epic, echoey bombast of Benedict Cumberbatch’s awesome villain John Harrison, an ex-Starfleet agent with a malevolent penchant for destruction. His villain forms the overarching driving force for the plot, which sees the crew of the Enterprise battling a particularly overwhelming form of terrorism directed all too close to home.

The preservation and indeed wanton fascination with the relationship between Spock and Kirk is the backbone of the franchise, and Abrams fully understands the bearing this has over whatever story he’s telling within this universe. The moral issues between the two protagonists are both engaging and integral to the emotional core of the film, and they cast a formidable shadow over the generic demands of the genre. An opening sequence – set amidst a perilous observation mission on a primitive, volcano-encumbered planet – has ostensibly little to do with the overarching narrative, yet the decisions made by hot-blooded Kirk (his ship’s heart) and rule despot Spock (it’s logic-motivated head) continue to reverberate throughout the succeeding action. This paves the way for the further fleshing out of the traits and principles that clearly define the large cast of characters, allowing even smaller roles the opportunity to once again leave their mark (though Zoe Saldana’s sultry Lieutenant Uhura is unfortunately pushed to the margins, yet fortunately not made as redundant as newcomer Alice Eve is after a glaringly useless underwear shot).

A blatant refusal to part with the frameworks of Star Trek ultimately robs Into Darkness of overall expansion and implants a sense of arrested development. The outcome of Spock and Kirk’s once again tried and tested friendship is copied almost verbatim from its predecessor, which forced into focus the humane notion that, regardless of race, temperament or perspective, loyalty will out. This is also true of the finale of the opening chapter in this hopefully long-lasting revamp, which saw Leonard Nimoy’s Spock Prime – cleverly interwoven into the current mythology – intoning the show’s phrase by outlining the Enterprise’s five-year mission to seek out and explore new worlds, life forms and ultimately go, boldly, where no man has gone before. It left on the promise of further exotic adventures fuelled by inquisition, yet it’s ultimately a promise that Star Trek Into Darkness – with its backwards-facing elaboration and duplicated nature – struggles to keep.

Review: Gimme the Loot

gimme-the-loot-gimme-the-loot-02-01-2013-4-g

(Adam Leon, 2012)
(Originally posted at CineVue)

If distinguished American filmmakers Woody Allen and Spike Lee amalgamated their cinematic perceptions and thematic concerns into a single project, chances are it would end up closely resembling Gimme the Loot (2012), the feature debut of resident New Yorker Adam Leon championed by fellow director Jonathan Demme. After competing in the Un Certain Regard section at the 2012 Cannes Film Festival and subsequently going on to win the Narrative Feature Grand Jury Prize at SXSW in the same year, Leon’s film arrives boasting a fair amount of positive buzz that is completely warranted; it is an authentic and charming story of desperation and the desire to leave ones mark in a modern city that doesn’t particularly care for the protagonist’s outwardly diminutive voices.

Set over two balmy summer days in and around the hustling Bronx borough of New York City, Gimme the Loot sees two frustrated teenage friends Malcolm and Sofia (competently played by Ty Hickson and Tashiana Washington, respectively) embarking on a mission that will bring their passion for graffiti to a publically broadcasted crescendo. After a rival gang defaces their latest piece, the pair plot to get revenge by ‘tagging’ the Mets Home Run Apple: an iconic NYC landmark whose ruination they believe will fully put their name on the graffiti-artist map.

However, after learning they need to raise $500 to pull off such a spectacularly hare-brained scheme – a steep fee they cannot immediately fund – Malcolm and Sofia set off on an adventure through the sun-soaked and diversified streets of the The Big Apple’s murkier underbelly, fuelled by the opportunity of illicitly gaining money from black market spray cans, stolen narcotics and pilfered sneakers. Throughout their quest for cash, the two come across a diverse range of characters who either enhance or hinder their plans, especially a divisive stoner (Zoë Lescaze) who may or may not hold the key to their ultimate success.

Light-hearted, short and evenly judged, Gimme the Loot excels through Leon’s – who cut his teeth directing short films and music videos – refusal to let it become more than it needs to be: an upbeat and simple tale of the joys and possibilities of youth rather than it’s numerous drawbacks. Of course, whilst the forms of variously contentious juvenile delinquency seen dabbled in by the characters is not to be venerated, Leon (who also wrote the screenplay) captures it all as acts of anxiety performed by kids with financial and personal hardships, as well as their only source of immediate income. This is all acted out on real locations through often guerrilla style conditions, and cinematographer Jonathan Miller does an excellent job of pinpointing the sometimes gritty, always vibrant and unpredictable streets of a city in continuous motion.

Joining the pantheon of filmmaker’s who know exactly how to project the look and feel of a contemporary urbane climate and its many facets, Leon has created a universally identifiable story of friendship and, as teased at the end, love that is as soulful as it is pleasantly optimistic.

Review: Upstream Colour

upstreamcolour

(Shane Carruth, 2013)

(Originally posted at The Hollywood News)

Synopsis: Kris (Amy Seimetz), a dynamic career woman, becomes the apparently random latest victim of an unnamed serial assailant, who induces her into a disorientated state of compliance whilst embezzling her wealth and lifestyle. Later, Kris meets fellow victim Jeff (Carruth) and they both attempt to uncover their splintered existence in an unforgiving modern world.

After wowing the 2004 Sundance Film Festival with the bracing, experimental and philosophically wrought cult brainteaser Primer, American cinematic wunderkind Shane Carruth makes a triumphantly belated return with his sophomore directorial oddity Upstream Colour. Just as his first project saw the filmmaker shunning established filmic principles in his approach to implementing the science fiction genre, Carruth’s latest is more of an innate symphony of ostracism sung from a deeply idiosyncratic voice; an ambitious, inventive and hypnotically contemplative entity wholly beyond compare.

It is within Carruth’s lack of empathy for, and simultaneous defiance of, narrative codes and genre conventions that make his latest one of the most challenging and markedly unclassifiable films to emanate from American independent cinema in quite some time. It also makes descriptions of its sprawling and cerebral storyline all the more harder to comprehend, though to disregard such an occasionally perplexing and bold refusal to pander to customary audience-pleasing formula would be a disservice to both the film and one’s take on its intellectually meditative outlooks. Here Carruth strikes a densely layered balance between the dissemination of his high-concept plot and overarching concerns, augmented as they are by an indelible passion for humanity, and creates a work of meticulous and methodically oblique beauty.

Far removed from the recognisability of stiff three-act storytelling structures, Carruth dons a formless manner in an attempt to simultaneously subvert and celebrate filmic formulations, using his work to spawn an all-encompassing confluence of guises, tones and rhythms. Upstream Colour is that most peculiar of hybrids; one that succinctly unifies shades of the crime thriller with an organically rendered and lyrical story exploring love and what it is to be in a relationship reinforced by an ingrained sense of dependency. The baffling, clinically observed catalyst for Kris and Jeff’s disorientation – which could be labelled as a destructive form of forced existential espionage – needs no clear explanations because Carruth spends the first half of the film wrapped in its own visually coiffured enigma, using performance and dreamlike tangents to blur the need for answers. This is extended into the film’s melodic second tier as the protagonists’ search for resolutions is reflected within the microscopic world of nature, parasites and pig farming, as is the ethereal presence of a hushed foley artist capturing the silent world through a microphone.

Similar to fellow distinct American auteur Terrence Malick, who imbues every facet of his latter-day craft with visual and aural ruminations on religion, Carruth – who also wrote, produced and edited the film whilst producing the ambient sound design and remarkable cinematography – shuns dramatic methods in favour of weaving together an astonishing symphonic sound palette with stark imagery. This creates a poignant insight into the all-pervasive interconnections of humanity unimpeded by dialogue or action; a seamless echoing of the stasis of life in continuous flux that, whilst arranged in a methodical but unknowable style, is distinctly cinematic storytelling handled by a learned practitioner.

Review: Mad Men – Season 6 Episode 3: ‘The Collaborators’

1 2

(Wri. Matthew Weiner & Jonathan Igla, Dir. Jon Hamm)

Once again charged with steering a season’s difficult third episode after its titanic feature-length opener, Jon Hamm returns to the chair to direct ‘The Collaborators’, a sombre and increasingly murky follow-up to the heft of ‘The Doorway’ (s06/e01-2). Whereas his season five directorial debut – the rather languid ‘Tea Leaves’ (s05/e03) – had the task of re-introducing Don Draper’s contentious ex-wife Betty Francis (then labelled Fat Betty) into the narrative whilst simultaneously bringing in a hot-headed new character (the frantic genius Michael Ginsberg) to the SCDP offices, ‘The Collaborators’ is much more of a contemplative and disconcerting spike in what appears to be this season’s near-total exposure to the darker territories the show has hinted at earlier on. It also returns to a narrative and thematic thread largely expressed in the past (in episodes such as ‘Signal 30’ (s05/e05) and ‘Lady Lazarus’ (s05/e08)), which is Pete Campbell’s desperation to fit into a Don Draper-shaped mould that, unbeknownst to him, is continuing to shift between several permutations. It is also a model even its founder continues to be unsatisfied with.

‘The Collaborators’ is an episode that explores the several literal and rhetorical ramifications of infidelity, and is in itself teeming with it as it seeps in to all of the narrative strands on show. Hamm displays a strong knack for balancing storylines concerning, essentially, the show’s three main protagonists, who come in the form of Don, Pete and Peggy, and equally does a great job of finessing such unlikable material. As highlighted at the end of the previous episode, Don has indeed shirked his mission for absolute fidelity and begun cheating on Megan with his newfound friend’s wife Sylvia Rosen (excellently played by Linda Cardellini), who lives a few floors below. Don is fervent and voracious in his single-minded dedication to this latest affair, pursuing his latest muse like an illicitly charged predator hunting his prey. We’ve seen him in the throes of previous dalliances before, getting his kicks and scratching the persistent itch whilst his family sit at home watching the clock. Here, however, it is performed a lot closer to home than before (literally under Megan’s nose), and just like his liaisons with Bobbie Barrett and Sally’s school teacher in previous seasons, the truth will out eventually as his eye continues to be distracted. He’s told women he can’t stop thinking of them in the past, and here he literally wont leave Sylvia alone, guided as he is by incessant infatuation. The scene with them playing chicken at the dinner table that should have been shared by their respective partners is as sexually charged as anything the show has done.

Pete, on the other hand, has made no bones about expressing just how unfulfilled he is with his current lot in life. That Trudy kicks him to the curb after finding out his latest bout of adultery – with, like Don, a neighbour – creates a new dynamic to their surface-layer marriage: it gives him exactly what he wants without the freedom because, in true Trudy fashion, she refuses to be a failure and bow to a divorce.

The episode saw the return of flashbacks from Don’s childhood growing up in a whorehouse, which, although rather lazily dropped in (Weiner’s stressing there are still pages in Don’s legacy still unturned), creates an interesting linearity with the series’ current narrative. Prostitution is alluded to in Don’s gesture of – after intercourse – giving Sylvia money after overhearing her husband refusing to give her any before he goes to work. The subject is also echoed throughout the rest of the episode, particularly with the re-appearance of Herb from Jaguar, which causes Don to revisit the frustrations of not being able to prevent Joan’s actions to secure her future at the agency a year ago whilst simultaneously averting Herb’s grip over his staff. If season five was all about success and the financial sustenance of SCDP as they sought and won business with the likes of Heinz and Jaguar, then this episode (and potentially future ones) is about the preservation and maintenance of said accounts. This is something of a rarity on Mad Men; usually we see the creative pursuit and eventual attainment of business, but seldom is the aftermath of it conveyed.

‘The Collaborators’ shows that it isn’t all smiling faces and bootlicking, but bartering and the negotiating of ideas plays a strong role in the requisite housekeeping. Raymond returns and Weiner highlights exactly why he was so demanding and hard to please whilst Don et al pursued Heinz Baked Beans last season: he’s anxious about keeping ahead of the game now that he’s got a successful advertising campaign for his small-time section of the business. That he warns SCDP not to chase the newly available Ketchup division (“The Coca-Cola of condiments” says Ken in the episode’s best line) sparks in Don an atypical sense of loyalty toward his client, something he can’t, or won’t, bring home with him. Sometimes, he says, you gotta dance with the one who brung you. He may not go after Ketchup, but it wont stop his nemesis Ted Chaough over at CGC from cocking his Peggy-shaped gun after she lets slip about the fact Heinz is taking interviews. An inevitable showdown between Don Draper and Peggy Olsen, master and apprentice, may occur, which will bring about another notch on the fascinating relationship between a man lost in time and the only woman he refuses to cheat on.

Extra thoughts:

·        Buckling under the emotional weight of her recent miscarriage, Megan is seen wearing an all-encompassing house coat very similar to Betty’s in all but colour.

·        The standout scene belongs to Trudy, Pete and the final breakdown in their marriage, which is something very similar to Don and Betty in seasons 1-3. Pete, like Don, skulks through the kitchen, coat draped on arm, kisses his wife goodbye and goes to leave for work, only to be confronted. Trudy is the opposite of Betty in many ways; she’s the empowered and successful housewife who, when push came to shove, made no bones about stating her demands, something Betty took years to muster the courage to do.

·        A prostitute in one of the flashbacks says to a teenage Don: “Find your own sins”.

·        Oliver Muirhead, the consummate token Englishman, plays a Jaguar employee here. He delivered his lines like he’s lucky to be in such a prestigious show.

·        Great final images of Don, in flashback, peeping through the keyhole of his uncle bedding his mother, whilst Don in present tense sits exhausted outside his front door, unable to go through to the mess he continues to make inside. If half-hearted, the flashback sequences remind us that Weiner is still chiselling at the ice block that is Don Draper.

·       Credits song: Just a Gigolo – Bing Crosby

Review: Mad Men – Season 6 Episodes 1&2: ‘The Doorway’

Screen shot 2013-04-12 at 16.37.07 Screen shot 2013-04-12 at 16.37.29

(Wri. Matthew Weiner, Dir. Scott Hornbacher)

The pertinent question “Are you alone?” – posed by a blonde temptress to a stoic Don Draper – was the bracing cliffhanger that rounded off the stunning, poetic fifth season of Matthew Weiner’s epic televisual novel, Mad Men, which makes a monumentally solemn return for a sixth and penultimate run. A close up of Draper’s face literally contemplating such a loaded inquiry before turning his tempted head sewed up a season that wove together the show’s standard intimations and concerns with death and the unappeasable pursuit of happiness but gave them a bleaker and more weighty angle, as each character from the robust ensemble individually mused about mortality and their positions in an ever-changing world. If season five highlighted and subsequently explored the awesome position mortality has in one’s self-identification, then ‘The Doorway’ carries across such hefty themes but exacerbates them, dealing unequivocally with death and loneliness whilst answering the aforementioned question regarding Don’s fidelity. It’s seamless and totally fitting that Weiner is fully confronting death on a more personable level now that his baby is reaching its looming demise, and it’s a subject that pervades a feature-length episode of a show already steeped in substantial visual and thematic metaphor.

The suicide of Lane Pryce late in season five formed a considerable shadow over its final episode ‘The Phantom’, which saw Don perusing the guilt he felt in playing a significant part in his colleague’s untimely death and, by extension, his brother Adam’s back in season one, who hung himself after Don refused to let him back into his new, fraudulent life. The climax of ‘The Phantom’ signalled a harbinger of doom as Don’s aching tooth was extracted (“It’s not your tooth that’s rotten”, intones Adam’s ghost) and his marriage to Megan – now a fully realised soap opera actress – hung in the balance. The episode opens with the Draper’s bathed in the Hawaiian sun, with Don – physically silent for a whole eight minutes – reading in voiceover a line from Dante’s ‘Inferno’: “Midway in our life’s journey I went astray from the straight road and woke to find myself alone in a dark wood”; an image that will undoubtedly form as much of an integral resonance for the structure of the ensuing season as Frank O’Hara’s poetry volume ‘Meditations in an Emergency’ acted as a supplement to season two. It’s the tail end of 1967 and Don’s no closer to finding the proper means to scratch his anxious itch or finding the happiness that now seems completely unattainable. That he has indeed returned to cheating on his wife is indicative of his unchangeable persona; he is a man incapable of being – as a photographer taking profiles of the Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce staff in their renovated, reefer-stenched office demands – himself, because he refuses to acknowledge who Don Draper/Dick Whitman is and who he wants to be.

The case of Don’s stolen identity continues to reverberate in several forms throughout the series, and now it stares him in the face once again in the form of PFC Dinkins’ lighter, a soldier on a break from Vietnam and whose marriage Don attends on Waikiki Beach. Still searching for the uneasy balance between business and pleasure, Don is on an assignment (not holiday) for latest client The Royal Hawaiian, for whom he constructs an ad campaign that evokes, to everyone else but him, a sense of foreboding and, explicitly, suicide. It depicts an office drone shedding his skin and engaging in “The jumping off point” provided by the experience of the hotel; wading through a transient ocean towards an unknowable oasis, a close example of life continuing to imitate art. Throughout the episode Don appears indifferent and unchanged, that patented sleek ad man adrift in a sea of shifting haircuts, bushy beards and marijuana smoke; that is until the almost dreamlike closing scenes where, on New Years Eve, he sees off new friend Dr. Arnold Rosen wading away through a thick blanket of snow before promptly sleeping with his wife Sylvia (Linda Cardellini), who leant him her copy of ‘Inferno’. Stationed in horizontal, post-coital compunction, Don is an image of self-loathing and inexorable remorse, answering his newest conquest’s question of what he wants for the New Year with a deflated “I want to stop doing this”, something he knows won’t be happening any time soon.

This is a stark indication of the potential tenor of the successive episodes, welcoming the audience and characters to 1968 with a gloomy foreshadowing of Don’s constant battle with his perpetual existential crisis, whilst offering an apposite delineation to what Dr. Rosen surmises: that “people will do anything to alleviate their anxiety”. A thoughtful and profoundly moving season premiere, “The Doorway” does a perfect job of balancing heavy material alongside the show’s multitude of characters both minor and major, and although it has become a beautifully shrewd and dense watch, it is nevertheless a pleasure to see the return of a show that takes pride in a drip-feed approach to rewarding the more discerning viewer.

Extra thoughts:

·         As much as “The Doorway” focuses on Mad Men’s chief protagonist Don Draper, it is also a four-pronged and competently structured story that catches up with Roger Sterling, Betty Francis and Peggy Olsen; one whose nuances – as always – rewards repeat viewings.

·         Roger, seen last year openly bankrolling the agency whilst embracing LSD, is now seeking answers in psychotherapy, musing about life with a doctor who refuses to laugh at his jokes. In an episode filled with strong moments (especially for Roger, whose sobbing over the one-two punch of the death of his mother and the building’s shoeshine clerk was raw and incredibly poignant), the scene where he openly engages with the episode’s title sees him unleashing a lengthy diatribe about his discontent. His analogy about the events in life being represented by a series of doors that ultimately lead to the same dissatisfaction and close behind you is a spikey summation for a man deeply unhappy with what he has. “Turns out the experiences are nothing. They’re just pennies you pick up off the floor, stick in your pocket, and you’re just going in a straight line to you-know-where”, he says, and it’ll be interesting to see if he manages to find the keys to a door that will lead him to the contentment he seemed to enjoy with courting Megan’s mother last season. Though, of course, Roger is all about living for the now and disregarding the future consequences.

·         Similarly restless is Betty, although she’s come a long way from the callous, childish woman she once was. Still “reducing” her weight (excellent prosthetics), she appears – in more screen time than January Jones had in season 5 put together – a woman struggling to deal with the echoes of her venomous demeanour and keep her newfound nuclear family stable. This isn’t to say she’s totally unlikable (her joke regarding her assistance in her husband’s raping of daughter Sally’s friend, asleep in the next room, nosedives her ostensibly softer edges, said with a sinister Stepford robot smile), but she goes some way to being a more sympathetic maternal figure, even though her attentions are totally guided in the wrong direction. That Sally addresses her as Betty speaks volumes about their chequered relationship.

·        Betty’s shift from icy bottled blonde, which is a response to her being accused of not liking her life, to Elizabeth Taylor-esque brunette has a sub-Freudian complex as she looks peculiarly similarly to her Henry’s mother, Pauline.

·         Finally, seen as her agency’s Don Draper figure, Peggy is thriving in her job at Cutler Gleason and Chaough, exemplifying how much the apprentice has become the master and how good she really is in a crisis.

·        Credits song: Elvis Presley – Hawaiian Wedding Song.

Review: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

(Peter Jackson, 2012)
(Originally posted at CineVue)

Over ten years since he journeyed deep into J.R.R Tolkien’s fantastical literary world with the commercially and critically adored The Lord of the Rings trilogy, Peter Jackson makes his inevitable return to Middle-earth with the first of a new three-parter: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012). Taking the reins from original helmer Guillermo Del Toro, Jackson takes the source material – itself a prequel to LOTR – and burrows further into the templates he so vividly brought to life three times previously, fleshing out the established geography and characters whilst retrospectively exploring Bilbo Baggins’ adventures pre-Fellowship of the Ring.

In a faultless piece of casting, Martin Freeman stars as the stringently housebroken Baggins who, 60 years before the timeline of the original trilogy, enjoys nothing more than enjoying the humble means of his beloved Shire. A peaceful life is quickly ruptured however when the wizard Gandalf the Grey (played once again by Sir Ian McKellen) tasks him with joining an all-singing, all-consuming band of dwarves – thirteen in total – on their mission to reclaim the Lonely Mountain, their homeland, and its accompanying gold from the villainous dragon Smaug, who left them and their kin in ruin.

So begins a voyage fuelled by the dwarves’ fraught retribution, where Bilbo must learn to overcome his naivety and shallow prejudices in order to brave the incessant dangers of Middle earth’s darker territories, as well as live up to his assigned role as the expedition’s apprehensive ‘burglar’.

Replete with all the elements that have made LOTR so memorable and rewarding – namely the lavish, scrupulous set design, bountiful visuals and Howard Shore’s melodious score – The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is a suitable and authentically assembled return to both Tolkien’s creation and Jackson’s treatment of it, but it fails to shake off an air of insubstantiality; of a desperation to rekindle a winning formulae. In remaining meticulously faithful to the original (and slim) volume, whilst simultaneously weaving in material from the accompanying appendices, Jackson makes an admirable but tediously bloated play at creating a worthwhile prelude to the more recognised story, robbing the narrative of the sprightliness conveyed in the novel.

Scrupulously following the same structural template as LOTR: namely a quest blighted by constant clashes with the varyingly combatant species at play in this fictional universe, An Unexpected Journey serves merely as a basic introduction to what will hopefully be two tighter successors, one that incessantly pauses for spectacle to pad out a demanding 169-minute runtime. Sequences depicting battles with laughable cockney trolls, warring stone giants and a run-in with Gollum (Andy Serkis, in the film’s standout scene) distract from an ostensibly lighter tale of derring-do and camaraderie, as well as Bilbo’s integral discovery of The One Ring. Of course, it’s challenging to overcome the episodic nature of Tolkien’s original prose, yet in elongating the tale, Jackson has created a rigid and monotonous first part of a prologue to a far superior and engaging story. Thus, An Unexpected Journey gets off to a rocky start – here’s hoping for a marked improvement by the time middle film The Desolation of Smaug (2013) and climactic finale There and Back Again (2014) lumber into UK cinemas.